Of course, Tennessee applies its own procedural law, including its summary judgment standard. Hamer v. Se. Res. Grp., Inc., No. M2015-00643-COA-R3-CV, 2016 WL 853020, at *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 3, 2016) (citing Beach Cmty. Bank v. Labry, No. W2011-01583-COA-R3-CV, 2012 WL 2196174, at *3 n.6 (Tenn. Ct. App. June 15, 2012)) ("Because Tennessee is the forum state for this case, the procedural law of Tennessee, including its summary judgment standard, applies."). Although the ultimate burden is on Hillcrest to avoid the foreign judgment, see Guseinov, 467 S.W.3d at 925, because Polaris chose to file a summary judgment motion, we discern no palpable difference between the burden-shifting framework encompassed by Florida law and the Tennessee law applicable in this case.