From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamer v. Flatto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 1937
250 App. Div. 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

April 16, 1937.


Order dated January 7, 1937, denying, except in so far as it is for an extension of time to answer, the motion of certain defendants to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice; to compel plaintiffs to separate the alleged causes of action pursuant to rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice; to strike out certain paragraphs of the complaint pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and for other relief, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the moving defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Appeal from order dated February 9, 1937, denying motion for a rehearing and reargument dismissed. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hamer v. Flatto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 1937
250 App. Div. 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Hamer v. Flatto

Case Details

Full title:ANNIE L. HAMER and J. WESLEY HAMER, Suing as Individuals and as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 16, 1937

Citations

250 App. Div. 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)