(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Fincher v. State , 363 Ga. App. 439, 455 (8), 870 S.E.2d 833 (2022). (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Hambrick v. State , 278 Ga. App. 768, 770 (3), 629 S.E.2d 442 (2006). (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. at 772 (3), 629 S.E.2d 442.
(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Hambrick v. State, 278 Ga. App. 768, 772 (3) ( 629 SE2d 442) (2006). Viewing the statements at issue in their context, it is apparent that when the prosecutor made them, she was addressing the lack of physical injury or eyewitnesses to corroborate the girls' testimony.
The prosecutor's remark was an isolated comment during his explanation of the cycle of violence within Brown's and Miller's relationship. The State's single, off-hand comment does not rise to the level of egregiousness necessary to establish prejudice under Strickland. See Hambrick v. State, 278 Ga.App. 768, 771–772(3), 629 S.E.2d 442 (2006). Compare with Williams, 261 Ga.App. at 517–518(3), 583 S.E.2d 172.
This claim has no merit because the victim testified and both parties were therefore entitled to prove her prior consistent and inconsistent statements. Hambrick v. State, 278 Ga.App. 768, 769–770(2), 629 S.E.2d 442 (2006). See also Frazier v. State, 257 Ga. 690, 696(13), 362 S.E.2d 351 (1987).
The prosecutor's remark was an isolated comment during his explanation of the cycle of violence within Brown's and Miller's relationship. The State's single, off-hand comment does not rise to the level of egregiousness necessary to establish prejudice under Strickland. See Hambrick v. State, 278 Ga.App. 768, 771–772(3), 629 S.E.2d 442 (2006). Compare with Williams, 261 Ga.App. at 517–518(3), 583 S.E.2d 172.
Hines v. State, 246 Ga. App. 835, 837 (3) ( 541 SE2d 410) (2000).Hambrick v. State, 278 Ga. App. 768, 770 (3) ( 629 SE2d 442) (2006).Lupoe v. State, 284 Ga. 576, 579 (3) (f) ( 669 SE2d 133) (2008).
(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Hambrick v. State, 278 Ga. App. 768, 772 (3) ( 629 SE2d 442) (2006). And, because the statement was not improper, it can provide no basis for an ineffective assistance claim.