From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamano v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 9, 2020
Case No. 2:19-CV-03788-SVW-AFM (C.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:19-CV-03788-SVW-AFM

04-09-2020

CHASE HAMANO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., ROBERT A. KOTICK, SPENCER NEUMANN AND COLLISTER JOHNSON, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

On March 23, 2020, the Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Complaint (the "Order"). (ECF 151.) The Order granted Plaintiff 14 days to amend the First Amended Consolidated Complaint ("FAC"), noting that failure to amend within this timeframe would result in dismissal with prejudice. (Id.) Because Plaintiff did not amend the FAC within this timeframe (i.e., by April 7, 2020), dismissal with prejudice is warranted.

Accordingly, pursuant to the Court's Order dismissing this case, JUDGMENT is HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Activision Blizzard, Inc., Robert A. Kotick, Spencer Neumann, and Collister Johnson (collectively, "Defendants") and against Lead Plaintiff United Association Local Union 393 Defined Benefit Pension Plan and Defined Contribution Plans.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 9, 2020

/s/_________

Hon. Stephen V. Wilson

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Hamano v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 9, 2020
Case No. 2:19-CV-03788-SVW-AFM (C.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Hamano v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHASE HAMANO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 9, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:19-CV-03788-SVW-AFM (C.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2020)