Hamann v. Becklenberg

Full title: Loretta Hamann et al., Appellants, v. Fred Becklenberg, Appellee

Court: Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: May 13, 1941

310 Ill. App. 385 (Ill. App. Ct. 1941)

34 N.E.2d 88

Opinion

Gen. No. 46,905. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed May 13, 1941

APPEAL AND ERROR, § 1376^_ — presumption, sufficiency of evidence. In action by bondholders upon guaranty, plaintiff could not contend that cause should be decided upon the pleadings, where questions of fact as to plaintiff's ownership of the bonds were raised, judgment recited that court heard the evidence and arguments of counsel, and in absence of report of proceedings reviewing court would presume evidence heard by trial court was sufficient to justify judgment.

_ See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Municipal Court of Chicago; Hon. JOHN V. McCORMICK, presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in second division, first district, this court at October term, 1939.

Arthur O. Kiesgen, for appellants;

James M. Gillespie, of counsel;

Arthur Abraham and Patrick J. Crowley, for appellee.

Opinion by JUSTICE SCANLAN.

"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed May 13, 1941.