Opinion
2019-1890 2019-1891
06-15-2020
HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K., Appellant v. SEMICAPS PTE LTD., Appellee
JARED WESTON NEWTON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by RYAN SETH GOLDSTEIN, Los Angeles, CA; DAVID EISEMAN, IV, San Francisco, CA; KOICHIRO MINAMINO, Minamino Law Office, PLLC, Washington, DC. CAROLYN CHANG, Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by HECTOR JULIAN RIBERA, RYAN J. MARTON.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017-02110, IPR2017-02112.
JUDGMENT
JARED WESTON NEWTON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by RYAN SETH GOLDSTEIN, Los Angeles, CA; DAVID EISEMAN, IV, San Francisco, CA; KOICHIRO MINAMINO, Minamino Law Office, PLLC, Washington, DC. CAROLYN CHANG, Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by HECTOR JULIAN RIBERA, RYAN J. MARTON. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 15, 2020
Date
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court