From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamama v. Adducci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 25, 2021
Case No. 17-11910 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 17-11910

01-25-2021

USAMA J. HAMAMA, et al., Petitioners, v. REBECCA ADDUCCI, et al., Respondents.


OPINION & ORDER DENYING PETITIONER JAFAR MUHSIN ALKURDI'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Dkt. 673)

On November 25, 2020, Jafar Muhsin Alkurdi filed a petition for writ of mandamus (Dkt. 669). On December 23, 2020, the Court denied the petition without prejudice (Dkt. 672). On December 24, 2020, Alkurdi filed a letter regarding his petition for writ of mandamus (Dkt. 673). The Court treats this letter as a motion for reconsideration of the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus.

The Court may grant a motion for reconsideration if the movant satisfactorily shows that: (1) a palpable defect mislead the parties and the Court; and (2) correcting the defect would result in a different disposition of the case. E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(h)(3). A defect is palpable if it is "obvious, clear, unmistakable, manifest, or plain." Olson v. Home Depot, 321 F. Supp. 2d 872, 874 (E.D. Mich. 2004). The Court will not grant a motion for reconsideration "that merely present[s] the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication." Id.

Alkurdi's motion for reconsideration is identical in all but one respect to his petition for writ of mandamus: the motion for reconsideration includes an additional page in which Alkurdi provides that he didn't have his Iraqi citizenship documents when he was ordered deported, but he now has them. This additional fact has no bearing on the reasons the Court set out in its order denying Alkurdi's petition for a writ of mandamus. Because Alkurdi points to no palpable defect, and the Court discerns none, Alkurdi's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 673) is denied.

SO ORDERED. Dated: January 25, 2021

Detroit, Michigan

s/Mark A. Goldsmith

MARK A. GOLDSMITH

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on January 25, 2021.

s/Karri Sandusky

Case Manager


Summaries of

Hamama v. Adducci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 25, 2021
Case No. 17-11910 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Hamama v. Adducci

Case Details

Full title:USAMA J. HAMAMA, et al., Petitioners, v. REBECCA ADDUCCI, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 25, 2021

Citations

Case No. 17-11910 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2021)