From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamady v. Shermeta Adams & Von Allmen PC

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 26, 2020
943 N.W.2d 119 (Mich. 2020)

Opinion

SC: 160712 COA: 350216

05-26-2020

Biana HAMADY, Plaintiff, and Auto Owners Insurance Company, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHERMETA ADAMS & VON ALLMEN PC and Cincinnati Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Cavanagh, J., did not participate due to her prior relationship with Garan Lucow Miller, P.C.


Summaries of

Hamady v. Shermeta Adams & Von Allmen PC

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 26, 2020
943 N.W.2d 119 (Mich. 2020)
Case details for

Hamady v. Shermeta Adams & Von Allmen PC

Case Details

Full title:BIANA HAMADY, Plaintiff, and AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Intervening…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: May 26, 2020

Citations

943 N.W.2d 119 (Mich. 2020)