From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ham v. Ozmint

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 28, 2010
406 F. App'x 705 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-7216.

Submitted: December 16, 2010.

Decided: December 28, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (6:10-CV-01095-DCN-KFM).

Angelo B. Ham, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, Lee Erter Wilson Holler Smith, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Angelo B. Ham appeals the district court's interlocutory order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Ham's motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ham v. Ozmint, No. 6:10-cv-01095-DCN-KFM, 2010 WL 3394387 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

We have jurisdiction over this appeal from an interlocutory order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) (2006).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Ham v. Ozmint

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 28, 2010
406 F. App'x 705 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Ham v. Ozmint

Case Details

Full title:Angelo B. HAM, a/k/a Angelo Bernard Ham, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jon…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 28, 2010

Citations

406 F. App'x 705 (4th Cir. 2010)