From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ham v. Ozmint

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 5, 2011
448 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6604

10-05-2011

ANGELO B. HAM, a/k/a Angelo Bernard Ham, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JON OZMINT; ANTHONY J. PADULA; JOHN J. BROOKS; BRUCE OBERMAN; RONNIE CRIBB; DARRYL CAIN, Sergeant of SMU at L.C.I.; CHRISTOPHER GODFREY, Officer of SMU at L.C.I., Defendants - Appellees.

Angelo B. Ham, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, G. Murrell Smith, Jr., LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (6:10-cv-01095-DCN)

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo B. Ham, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, G. Murrell Smith, Jr., LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Angelo B. Ham appeals the denial of his motions to appoint counsel and to compel discovery and the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ham v. Ozmint, No. 6:10-cv-01095-DCN (D.S.C. May 14, 2010; Nov. 1, 2010; Jan 26, 2011 & Apr. 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Ham v. Ozmint

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 5, 2011
448 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Ham v. Ozmint

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO B. HAM, a/k/a Angelo Bernard Ham, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

448 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2011)