Opinion
3:23-CV-05698-BJR
10-19-2023
JONG HAM, an individual, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a Delaware corporation, Defendant.
CAIRNCROSS & HEMPELMANN, P.S., Binah B. Yeung, Amy H. Yoon, Attorneys for Plaintiff Jong Ham MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Per D. Jansen, Attorneys for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
CAIRNCROSS & HEMPELMANN, P.S., Binah B. Yeung, Amy H. Yoon, Attorneys for Plaintiff Jong Ham
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Per D. Jansen, Attorneys for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, U.S. District Court Judge
STIPULATED MOTION
Plaintiff Jong Ham (“Ham”) and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) (collectively, the “Parties”) jointly request that the Court modify the briefing schedule on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed October 16, 2023 (Dkt. 17) to allow for additional time to accommodate the Parties' schedules and upcoming holiday season. The Parties certify that they have conferred and stipulate and agree that the deadlines to file oppositions and replies should be extended as follows:
• November 15, 2023 Response due by Plaintiff Jong Ham
• December 6, 2023 Reply due by Defendant JPMorgan Chase
CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated above, the Parties respectfully request the Court enter the order modifying briefing deadlines submitted herewith.
ORDER
Based on the Parties' foregoing Stipulated Motion, IT IS ORDERED that the briefing schedule on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 17) is modified as follows:
• November 15, 2023 Response due by Plaintiff Jong Ham
• December 6, 2023 Reply due by Defendant JPMorgan Chase