From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ham v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Nov 16, 2021
No. 30454-21 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 16, 2021)

Opinion

30454-21

11-16-2021

Michael Rodney Ham Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Lewis R. Carluzzo Chief Special Trial Judge.

There being nothing in the petition that gives rise to a justiciable issue, it is

ORDERED that this case is dismissed because petitioner has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Petitioner's attention is invited to I.R.C. section 6673(a). If it appears to the Court that a taxpayer's position in a proceeding before the Court is frivolous or groundless, then the Court can impose a penalty (not to exceed $25,000) on that taxpayer. Petitioner is advised that it appears to the Court that the position he has taken in this case is frivolous or groundless. No penalty will be imposed at this time. However, future submissions advancing a frivolous or groundless position will result in the imposition of a penalty.


Summaries of

Ham v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Nov 16, 2021
No. 30454-21 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Ham v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Michael Rodney Ham Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Nov 16, 2021

Citations

No. 30454-21 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 16, 2021)