From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halvorsen v. Halvorsen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1982
88 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

May 3, 1982


In a matrimonial action, the defendant wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Duberstein, J.), dated July 31, 1981, which denied her motion to vacate and set aside a judgment of divorce granted to the plaintiff husband on May 28, 1976. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith. In view of the closely contested factual dispute regarding service upon the defendant in the divorce action, it was error for the court to deny the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (subd [a], par 4) to vacate the resulting judgment without first conducting a hearing. The matter cannot be determined upon the conflicting affidavits before the court. (See Dege v. Mascot Realty Corp., 243 App. Div. 546; see, also, Antalek v. Elliott, 26 A.D.2d 716; Matter of Roberts, 19 A.D.2d 391; cf. Weinberg v. Hillbrae Bldrs., 58 A.D.2d 546. ) Damiani, J.P., Lazer, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Halvorsen v. Halvorsen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1982
88 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Halvorsen v. Halvorsen

Case Details

Full title:OLAF HALVORSEN, Respondent, v. KAY HALVORSEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 1982

Citations

88 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Imbriale v. Imbriale

In any event, the defendant was not entitled to notice of the date of the inquest in view of the fact that…

Danois v. Danois

The affidavits submitted by the parties on the motion to vacate the judgment of divorce, entered on default,…