Haluck v. Ricoh Electronics Inc.

Full title: JAMES HALUCK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. RICOH ELECTRONICS…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Third Division

Date published: Jun 1, 2007

No. G035681 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 1, 2007)

Opinion

Page 719a

152 Cal.App.4th 719a __ Cal.Rptr.3d__ JAMES HALUCK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. RICOH ELECTRONICS, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants. G035681 California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Third Division June 1, 2007

Super. Ct. No. 03CC10166

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

RYLAARSDAM, J.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 1, 2007, (151 Cal.App.4th 994; ___Cal.Rptr.3d ___).] be modified in the following particulars only:

1. On page 13, in the second full paragraph on line three [151 Cal.App.4th 1006, advance report, 2d full par., line 3] starting with “inadmissible evidence,” delete “(People v. Sturm, supra, 37 Cal.App.4th at p. 1240.)” and replace it with

“(People v. Sturm, supra, 37 Cal.4th at p. 1240.)”

2. On page 13, in the second full paragraph on line seven [151 Cal.App.4th 1006, advance report, 2nd full par., line 8], starting with “the competence, honesty,” delete the entire quote starting with “Where the trial court,” and replace it with:

“The trial court’s comment implying that . . . counsel was behaving unethicvally or in an underhanded fashion constituted misconduct.”

These modifications do not change the judgment.

WE CONCUR: SILLS, P.J., BEDSWORTH, J.