From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halstied v. Jones

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Dec 15, 2006
CIV-06-995-R (W.D. Okla. Dec. 15, 2006)

Opinion

CIV-06-995-R.

December 15, 2006


ORDER


Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge entered December 9, 2006 [Doc. No. 10] and Plaintiff's motion to stay these proceedings filed December 4, 2006 [Doc. No. 14]. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has Plaintiff sought or been granted a further extension of time in which to object to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Plaintiff's motion to stay [Doc. No. 14] is DENIED because there is ample time remaining on the two-year statute of limitations applicable to Plaintiff's § 1983 claim(s) for Plaintiff to refile those claims after pursuing his remedies under Okla. Stat. tit. 57, §§ 564 564.1.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Halstied v. Jones

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Dec 15, 2006
CIV-06-995-R (W.D. Okla. Dec. 15, 2006)
Case details for

Halstied v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:HAYZE E. HALSTIED, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN JONES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 15, 2006

Citations

CIV-06-995-R (W.D. Okla. Dec. 15, 2006)