From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halpert v. Naporko

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug 23, 2017
225 So. 3d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. 3D17-1721.

08-23-2017

Haviva HALPERT, Petitioner, v. Pavel NAPORKO, Respondent.

Nancy A. Hass, P.A. and Nancy A. Hass (Hollywood); Sandy T. Fox, P.A. and Sandy T. Fox, for petitioner. Pazos Law Group, P.A. and Nadia Pazos (Weston), for respondent.


Nancy A. Hass, P.A. and Nancy A. Hass (Hollywood); Sandy T. Fox, P.A. and Sandy T. Fox, for petitioner.

Pazos Law Group, P.A. and Nadia Pazos (Weston), for respondent.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

Following review of the petition for writ of common law certiorari, it is ordered that said petition is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Specifically, the petitioner has failed to demonstrate irreparable harm. Millennium Diagnostic Imaging Ctr., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 129 So.3d 1086, 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ("A party seeking certiorari relief must demonstrate that the trial court's order depart[s] from the essential requirements of law, resulting in irreparable harm that cannot be adequately remedied on final appeal."); Stockinger v. Zeilberger, 152 So.3d 71, 73 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ("The establishment of irreparable harm is a condition precedent to invoking certiorari jurisdiction.").


Summaries of

Halpert v. Naporko

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug 23, 2017
225 So. 3d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Halpert v. Naporko

Case Details

Full title:Haviva HALPERT, Petitioner, v. Pavel NAPORKO, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Aug 23, 2017

Citations

225 So. 3d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)