From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. v. BEL FUSE INC.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 8, 2010
No. C-07-06222 RMW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2010)

Opinion

No. C-07-06222 RMW.

June 8, 2010


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL [Re Docket No. 220]


Defendant E E Magnetic Products Limited ("E E Magnetic") moves to file under seal a portion of its reply brief for its motion to dismiss as well as Exhibit A to the reply. E E Magnetic has represented that it seeks to file this material under seal because it has been designated "Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only" by Eltec Eltek (USA) Corporation ("E E USA"). On June 3, 2010, the court issued an order requesting E E USA to submit an identification of the portions of material that it feels is confidential and an explanation for why it is confidential. E E USA has represented that it does not object to making the unredacted versions of the reply brief and Exhibit A available to the public, with the exception of page seven of Exhibit A, which contains confidential information including the dates of specific activities in relation to accused products. The court therefore grants the motion to seal with respect to page seven of Exhibit A and denies the motion to seal in all other respects. Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(e), E E Magnetic has four days to refile the documents in a manner that conforms to this order.


Summaries of

HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. v. BEL FUSE INC.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 8, 2010
No. C-07-06222 RMW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2010)
Case details for

HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. v. BEL FUSE INC.

Case Details

Full title:HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. BEL FUSE INC., ELEC ELTEK (USA…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Jun 8, 2010

Citations

No. C-07-06222 RMW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2010)