From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hallissy v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 12, 2021
2:21-cv-01250-JAM-DB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01250-JAM-DB

08-12-2021

CAROL HALLISSY, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


[Stipulation filed concurrently]

Complaint Filed: July 16, 2021

ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Having reviewed the Parties' Stipulation to extend the time for Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS the Parties' Stipulation. Defendant shall have up to and including September 3, 2021 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hallissy v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 12, 2021
2:21-cv-01250-JAM-DB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Hallissy v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CAROL HALLISSY, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 12, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01250-JAM-DB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2021)