From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halligan v. National Drug Stores Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1927
222 App. Div. 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

December, 1927

Present — Young, Lazansky, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The lease did not provide that the premises should be used for the purpose prohibited by the ordinance, and, in construing the lease, regard should be had to the covenants providing in substance that the lessee should comply with the rules and regulations of the municipal authorities.

See Code of Ordinances of City of New York (1923), chap. 10, § 1, subd. 44; Id. chap. 10, § 272, subd. a. — [REP.


Summaries of

Halligan v. National Drug Stores Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1927
222 App. Div. 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Halligan v. National Drug Stores Corporation

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD F. HALLIGAN and Others, Respondents, v. NATIONAL DRUG STORES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1927

Citations

222 App. Div. 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)