From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haller v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 27, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1204 EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1204 EFB.

May 27, 2008


ORDER


On April 29, 2008, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause, in writing, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution based on her failure to file a motion for summary judgment pursuant to this court's scheduling order. Plaintiff timely responded to the order by filing a Rule 60(b) motion to vacate the court's order to show cause. In that motion, plaintiff's counsel explains that it was mistake and inadvertence on her part in failing to calendar the due date for the summary judgment motion.

The court construes plaintiff's Rule 60 motion as a response to the order to show cause, and good cause appearing, hereby discharges the order to show cause. Plaintiff shall file her motion for summary judgment by no later than June 4, 2008. Defendants' opposition or cross-motion thereto shall be due thirty days thereafter.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Haller v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 27, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1204 EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2008)
Case details for

Haller v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. HALLER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 27, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1204 EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2008)