From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. United States

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 25, 2023
No. C22-1639RSM (W.D. Wash. Jan. 25, 2023)

Opinion

C22-1639RSM

01-25-2023

RANDY LEE HALL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER DIRECTING THE UNITED STATES TO ANSWER §2255 PETITION

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2255 (Dkt. #1). After a preliminary review of the motion, the Court ORDERS as follows:

(1) Within forty-five (45) days after the filing of this Order, the United States shall file and serve an Answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases in United States District Courts. As part of its Answer, the United States shall state its position as to whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary, whether any discovery is necessary, whether there is any issue as to abuse or delay under Rule 9, and whether Petitioner's motion is barred by the statute of limitations.

(2) On the face of its Answer, the United States shall note this matter for the fourth Friday following the filing of its Answer, and the Clerk shall note the matter on the Court's docket accordingly.

(3) Petitioner may file a Reply to the Answer no later than the noting date.

The Clerk shall direct a copy of this Order to Petitioner.


Summaries of

Hall v. United States

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 25, 2023
No. C22-1639RSM (W.D. Wash. Jan. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Hall v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RANDY LEE HALL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jan 25, 2023

Citations

No. C22-1639RSM (W.D. Wash. Jan. 25, 2023)