From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Thornell

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jun 10, 2024
No. CV-23-08516-PCT-GMS-DMF (D. Ariz. Jun. 10, 2024)

Opinion

CV-23-08516-PCT-GMS-DMF

06-10-2024

Anthony Charles Hall, Petitioner, v. Ryan Thornell, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

G. MURRAY SNOW, CHIEF UNITED ST ATE S'DI STRICT JUDGE.

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine (Doc. 17) regarding petitioner's Motion for Injunction to Postpone Restitution Until Case Completion (Doc. 12). The R&R recommends that the Motion be denied. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 3 (citing United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Petitioner filed a response on February 22, 2024 (Doc. 21).

The Court has considered Petitioner's response wherein Petitioner states he accepts the Court's recommendation and that his motion is moot. (Doc. 21, p. 4).

The Court will accept the R&R and deny the Motion.

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 17) is accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Injunction (Doc. 12) is denied.


Summaries of

Hall v. Thornell

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jun 10, 2024
No. CV-23-08516-PCT-GMS-DMF (D. Ariz. Jun. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Hall v. Thornell

Case Details

Full title:Anthony Charles Hall, Petitioner, v. Ryan Thornell, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Jun 10, 2024

Citations

No. CV-23-08516-PCT-GMS-DMF (D. Ariz. Jun. 10, 2024)