From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 23, 2005
894 So. 2d 304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D04-1600.

February 23, 2005.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mary Barzee, Judge.

Arthur Hall, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.


Arthur Hall appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.800(a). The trial court denied the motion because the transcript clearly demonstrates that the trial judge did not become involved in the plea process. Although Rule 3.800(a) may not be the proper rule to raise a vindictive sentencing issue, we have nevertheless conducted an independent review of the record and agree with the trial court that the sentencing judge never became involved in the plea negotiations. Thus, we affirm the trial court's order denying defendant's motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 23, 2005
894 So. 2d 304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Hall v. State

Case Details

Full title:Arthur HALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 23, 2005

Citations

894 So. 2d 304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)