From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 12, 2012
No. 04-12-00141-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. 04-12-00141-CR

12-12-2012

Fred D. HALL, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION


From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CR-0678

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED

Fred D. Hall was convicted by a jury of assault on a public servant and sentenced by the trial court to five years in prison and a $2,000.00 fine. The trial court suspended the sentence of confinement and placed Hall on community supervision for a period of five years. Hall appeals the judgment.

Hall's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which she concludes this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Hall was provided copies of the brief and motion to withdraw and was informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. Hall has not filed a pro se brief.

After reviewing the record and counsel's brief, we find no reversible error and agree with counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Hall's and affirm the trial court's judgment. See id.; Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Hall wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after either this opinion is rendered or the last timely motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. R. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 68.4.

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice DO NOT PUBLISH


Summaries of

Hall v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 12, 2012
No. 04-12-00141-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Hall v. State

Case Details

Full title:Fred D. HALL, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Dec 12, 2012

Citations

No. 04-12-00141-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 12, 2012)