Hall v. State

1 Citing case

  1. Watley v. State

    635 S.E.2d 857 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 10 times

    In addition, Watley contends the lineup was suggestive because the victim's parents were in the room when she viewed the array. We will set aside a conviction that is based on a pretrial identification by photograph and a subsequent identification at trial only if the photographic lineup was so impermissibly suggestive that there exists a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. Hall v. State, 277 Ga. App. 413, 414 (2) ( 626 SE2d 611) (2006); Brodes v. State, 250 Ga. App. 323, 325 (2) ( 551 SE2d 757) (2001). A court need not consider whether there was a substantial likelihood of misidentification if it finds that the identification procedure was not impermissibly suggestive.