In addition, Watley contends the lineup was suggestive because the victim's parents were in the room when she viewed the array. We will set aside a conviction that is based on a pretrial identification by photograph and a subsequent identification at trial only if the photographic lineup was so impermissibly suggestive that there exists a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. Hall v. State, 277 Ga. App. 413, 414 (2) ( 626 SE2d 611) (2006); Brodes v. State, 250 Ga. App. 323, 325 (2) ( 551 SE2d 757) (2001). A court need not consider whether there was a substantial likelihood of misidentification if it finds that the identification procedure was not impermissibly suggestive.