From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Sprint Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 19, 2018
No. 18-1309 (4th Cir. Jul. 19, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-1309

07-19-2018

RODERICK JERMAINE HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SPRINT CORPORATION, d/b/a Sprint, Defendant - Appellee.

Roderick Jermaine Hall, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cv-00024-RJC-DSC) Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roderick Jermaine Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roderick Jermaine Hall appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) (2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hall's informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court's disposition, Hall has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Hall v. Sprint Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 19, 2018
No. 18-1309 (4th Cir. Jul. 19, 2018)
Case details for

Hall v. Sprint Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RODERICK JERMAINE HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SPRINT CORPORATION…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 19, 2018

Citations

No. 18-1309 (4th Cir. Jul. 19, 2018)