From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Smalls

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 16, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2653 JAM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-2653 JAM JFM (HC).

September 16, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's September 8, 2011 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.


Summaries of

Hall v. Smalls

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 16, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2653 JAM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Hall v. Smalls

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD S. HALL, Petitioner, v. LARRY SMALLS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 16, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-2653 JAM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)