From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HALL v. ROST ENTERPRISES

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division
Apr 28, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:04-cv-01038 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 28, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:04-cv-01038.

April 28, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Plaintiff alleges that she may be suffering from Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome ("RSD") a progressive disease of the nervous system, as a result of a workplace injury which occurred on August 27, 2002. (Docket # 97, p. 1.) Defendant Rost Enterprises seeks to compel Plaintiff to undergo an independent medical examination with neurologist Dr. Kuruvilla John on May 19, 2006 from 9:00 a.m. until approximately 12:00 p.m. (Docket # 97.)

Plaintiff filed a response to Defendant's motion on April 27, 2006. (Docket # 108.) Plaintiff objects to an independent medical exam because (1) she has already undergone one independent medical exam; and (2) the appointed time for this second exam falls outside the discovery period. (Docket # 108.)

The court notes that this response was untimely and reminds Plaintiff to adhere to the deadlines set by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the future.

The timing issue has been mooted by Judge Copenhaver's Order of April 26, 2006, which extended the discovery deadline until June 30, 2006. (Docket # 107.) With respect to the remaining issue, Defendant argues that while Plaintiff's overall physical condition was assessed by a rehabilitation specialist at the request of a co-defendant, a neurological examination is necessary in order to evaluate any neurological deficits arising from her alleged RSD. (Docket # 97.)

The court agrees that Plaintiff's purported ailment places her neurological condition in issue. The court finds good cause for this examination pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall attend the independent medical examination as scheduled with Dr. Kuruvilla John at 4522 MacCorkle Avenue, Suite 3, Charleston, WV 25304 on May 19, 2006 from 9:00 a.m. until approximately 12:00 p.m. This exam will consist of a neurological evaluation as requested by Defendant.

Defendant's Motion to Compel Independent Neurological Examination of Plaintiff (docket # 97) is GRANTED.

The Clerk is instructed to transmit copies of this written opinion and order to counsel of record.


Summaries of

HALL v. ROST ENTERPRISES

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division
Apr 28, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:04-cv-01038 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 28, 2006)
Case details for

HALL v. ROST ENTERPRISES

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA S. HALL, Plaintiff, v. ROST ENTERPRISES, a limited partnership…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division

Date published: Apr 28, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:04-cv-01038 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 28, 2006)