From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Rojirlo De La Cerda

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 9, 2024
5:23-cv-00707-CBM-AJR (C.D. Cal. May. 9, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-00707-CBM-AJR

05-09-2024

CRYSTAL HALL, Plaintiff, v. ROJIRLO DE LA CERDA ET AL Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HON. CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with Court orders.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Plaintiff at her current address of record. No defendant has appeared in the action.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Hall v. Rojirlo De La Cerda

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 9, 2024
5:23-cv-00707-CBM-AJR (C.D. Cal. May. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Hall v. Rojirlo De La Cerda

Case Details

Full title:CRYSTAL HALL, Plaintiff, v. ROJIRLO DE LA CERDA ET AL Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 9, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-00707-CBM-AJR (C.D. Cal. May. 9, 2024)