From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Rodriquez

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Apr 25, 2012
Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-011 (S.C. Apr. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-011

04-25-2012

Rachel Hall, Respondent, v. Angel Rodriquez, Petitioner.

James B. Richardson, Jr, and Steven R. Anderson, both of Columbia, for Petitioner. William E. Booth, III, of West Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS


Appeal from Richland County

Joseph M. Strickland, Master-in-Equity


DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

James B. Richardson, Jr, and Steven R. Anderson, both of Columbia, for Petitioner.

William E. Booth, III, of West Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Hall v. Rodriquez, Op. No. 2009-UP-564 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Nov. 30, 2009). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE, JJ., and Acting Justice James E. Moore, concur.


Summaries of

Hall v. Rodriquez

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Apr 25, 2012
Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-011 (S.C. Apr. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Hall v. Rodriquez

Case Details

Full title:Rachel Hall, Respondent, v. Angel Rodriquez, Petitioner.

Court:THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 25, 2012

Citations

Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-011 (S.C. Apr. 25, 2012)