Hall v. Rodriquez

Full title: Rachel Hall, Respondent, v. Angel Rodriquez, Petitioner.

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 25, 2012

Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-011 (S.C. Apr. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-011

04-25-2012

Rachel Hall, Respondent, v. Angel Rodriquez, Petitioner.

James B. Richardson, Jr, and Steven R. Anderson, both of Columbia, for Petitioner. William E. Booth, III, of West Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from Richland County

Joseph M. Strickland, Master-in-Equity

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

James B. Richardson, Jr, and Steven R. Anderson, both of Columbia, for Petitioner.

William E. Booth, III, of West Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Hall v. Rodriquez, Op. No. 2009-UP-564 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Nov. 30, 2009). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE, JJ., and Acting Justice James E. Moore, concur.