From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Peek N Peak Recreation, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 6, 2014
10-CV-10(A)(M) (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2014)

Opinion

10-CV-10(A)(M)

10-06-2014

ALEXANDRIA HALL, Plaintiff, v. PEEK 'N PEAK RECREATION, INC., Defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On September 12, 2014, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendant's motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 33) be granted.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation, the defendant's summary judgment motion is granted, and the Complaint is dismissed.

The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Richard J. Arcara

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Dated: October 6, 2014


Summaries of

Hall v. Peek N Peak Recreation, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 6, 2014
10-CV-10(A)(M) (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2014)
Case details for

Hall v. Peek N Peak Recreation, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDRIA HALL, Plaintiff, v. PEEK 'N PEAK RECREATION, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 6, 2014

Citations

10-CV-10(A)(M) (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2014)