From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Pagan

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 23, 2006
1:04CV01097 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2006)

Opinion

1:04CV01097.

March 23, 2006


ORDER


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on February 13, 2006, was served on the parties in this action. Counsel for Petitioner objected to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's motion for summary judgment [Pleading No. 5] be GRANTED, that Petitioner's cross-motion for summary judgment [Pleading No. 7] be DENIED, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.


Summaries of

Hall v. Pagan

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 23, 2006
1:04CV01097 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Hall v. Pagan

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES ANTHONY HALL, Petitioner, v. EMILO PAGAN, Superintendent, Morrison…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Mar 23, 2006

Citations

1:04CV01097 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2006)