From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

November, 1928.


Order denying defendant's motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint and decline jurisdiction reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. There are no facts shown herein warranting the retaining of jurisdiction of this case. ( Douglas v. New York, New Haven Hartford R.R. Co., 223 App. Div. 782; Larrive v. Prince Line, Ltd., 224 id. 764.) Facts of the character contained in Murnan v. Wabash Railway Co. ( 246 N.Y. 244) are not present in this record. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hall v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Hall v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN M. HALL, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed, of the Goods…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1928

Citations

225 App. Div. 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)