From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. McCarty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 9, 2013
Case No. 12-12064 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-12064

04-09-2013

STACEY SIMEON HALL, Plaintiff, v. ANN McCARTY et al., Defendants.


Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff


ORDER

On March 14, 2013, the Court ordered Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, to show cause [dkt 28] as to why the Court should not dismiss this case for Plaintiff's failure to timely serve the remaining Defendants with the summons and complaint.

Plaintiff's submission, received via facsimile, is utterly unresponsive to the Court's show-cause order. The submission generally reiterates the claims alleged in Plaintiff's complaint, and it requests that the undersigned disqualify himself from this case. It does not, however, offer any explanation of Plaintiff's failure to timely serve the remaining Defendants, nor does it provide any indication that Plaintiff intends to effectuate service on those Defendants.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against all unserved Defendants are DISMISSED due to Plaintiff's failure to timely effectuate service or show good cause why an extension is warranted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

This order resolves all outstanding issues and closes the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hall v. McCarty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 9, 2013
Case No. 12-12064 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Hall v. McCarty

Case Details

Full title:STACEY SIMEON HALL, Plaintiff, v. ANN McCARTY et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 9, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-12064 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 9, 2013)