Opinion
Civil Action No. 8:11-1317-TLW-JDA.
October 25, 2011
ORDER
On June 1, 2011, the Plaintiff, Brian K. Hall ("Plaintiff"), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil action construed as an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. #1).
The matter now comes before this Court for review of the Report and Recommendation ("the Report") filed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin to whom this case had previously been assigned. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). (Doc. #19). By Order of this Court, objections were due on October 12, 2011. (Doc. #27). Plaintiff has filed no objections to the Report.
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983).
The Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. (Doc. #19). The complaint is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process.