From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Maass

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 19, 1993
852 P.2d 966 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

90C11608; CA A72971

Argued and submitted April 5, 1993

Reversed and remanded May 19, 1993

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Richard D. Barber, Judge.

James F. Evans, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Stephanie Andrus, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Diane S. Lefkow, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded.


In this habeas corpus proceeding, plaintiff appeals an order allowing defendant's motion to strike his replication. ORS 34.680(2). We reverse.

In March, 1990, plaintiff suffered a heart attack while incarcerated and was not taken to the hospital for 16 hours. He alleges that he still suffers from serious heart and circulatory problems that are not being treated promptly and that, as a consequence of those delays, he receives constitutionally inadequate medical care. Plaintiff states sufficient facts in support of his claim. ORS 34.362(2). The seriousness of the medical condition and the alleged lack of treatment requires immediate judicial scrutiny, and there is no other timely remedy. ORS 34.362(2). The replication stated a claim for habeas corpus relief.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Hall v. Maass

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 19, 1993
852 P.2d 966 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Hall v. Maass

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM F. HALL, Appellant, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 19, 1993

Citations

852 P.2d 966 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
852 P.2d 966