From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Lapeer Cnty. Med. Examiner's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 13, 2012
Case No. 12-11497 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-11497

08-13-2012

BRUCE J. HALL, Plaintiff, v. LAPEER COUNTY MEDICAL EXAMINER'S OFFICE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

On April 30, 2012, the court, after granting Plaintiff Bruce Hall's application to bring this suit without the prepayment of fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), dismissed his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff filed a timely notice of appeal and, on July 23, 2012, he filed a an application to proceed in forma pauperis on that appeal.

A party given permission to proceed without prepayment of fees in the district court normally does not need further authorization to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). However, this is not the case when the district court certifies that an appeal is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A). For the reasons stated in the court's opinion and order dismissing Plaintiff's complaint—namely, Plaintiff's failure to allege any discernable legal claim that is not barred by the statute of limitations—Plaintiff's appeal of that order is frivolous and not taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962) (holding that good faith under § 1915(a) is demonstrated when party seeks appellate review of any issue that is not frivolous). Therefore, the court has not extended him permission to pursue his appeal without prepayment of fees.

Moreover, when a party to a district-court action desires to appeal in forma pauperis, he must file a motion in the district court accompanied by an affidavit: describing in detail his inability to pay; claiming an entitlement to redress; and stating the issues that the party intends to present on appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1). As Plaintiff's application does not conform to these procedural requirements, the court sees no reason to allow him to proceed on appeal without paying the requisite fees. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [Dkt. # 7] is DENIED. In accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(5), Plaintiff may file in the court of appeals a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal within thirty days after service of this order.

_______________

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, August 13, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Lisa Wagner

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522


Summaries of

Hall v. Lapeer Cnty. Med. Examiner's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 13, 2012
Case No. 12-11497 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Hall v. Lapeer Cnty. Med. Examiner's Office

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE J. HALL, Plaintiff, v. LAPEER COUNTY MEDICAL EXAMINER'S OFFICE, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 13, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-11497 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2012)