Hall v. Gerdes

2 Citing cases

  1. Jolley v. Chicago Thoroughbred Enterprises, Inc.

    275 F. Supp. 325 (N.D. Ill. 1967)   Cited 1 times

    " In Hall v. Gerdes, [68] Ill.App[2d 119], 215 N.E.2d 8 (1966) it was held that the doctrine of assumption of risk is applicable only to cases arising between master and servant and we there referred to the case of Hensley v. Hensley, 62 Ill.App.2d 252, 210 N.E. 2d 568 (1965). Hensley has an extended discussion of the application of assumption of risk. It is clear here that there was not in existence a master and servant relationship. ( 70 Ill. App.2d at 386-387, 217 N.E.2d at 127)

  2. Fosen v. Odell Grain Coal Co.

    217 N.E.2d 126 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)   Cited 1 times

    This action by the trial court was not error. [2] In Hall v. Gerdes, 68 Ill. App.2d 119, 215 N.E.2d 8 (1966), it was held that the doctrine of assumption of the risk is applicable only to cases arising between master and servant and we there referred to the case of Hensley v. Hensley, 62 Ill. App.2d 252, 210 N.E.2d 568 (1965). Hensley has an extended discussion of the application of assumption of risk. It is clear here that there was not in existence a master-and-servant relationship.