From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 21, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2293 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2293 MCE DAD P.

February 21, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's January 31, 2008 motion for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Hall v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 21, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2293 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2008)
Case details for

Hall v. Felker

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN HALL, Petitioner, v. T. FELKER, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 21, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2293 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2008)