Opinion
CIVIL 2:21-cv-01994-APG-BNW
01-03-2022
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC Miles N. Clark, Esq. KRIEGER LAW GROUP LLC David H. Krieger, Esq. Counsel for Plaintiff Judd Hall McDONALD CARANO LLP Rory Kay, Esq. Tara U. Teegarden, Esq. Counsel for Defendant CoreLogic Teletrack
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC Miles N. Clark, Esq. KRIEGER LAW GROUP LLC David H. Krieger, Esq. Counsel for Plaintiff Judd Hall
McDONALD CARANO LLP Rory Kay, Esq. Tara U. Teegarden, Esq. Counsel for Defendant CoreLogic Teletrack
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (FIRST REQUEST)
BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendant, CoreLogic Teletrack (“Teletrack”) and Plaintiff Judd Hall (“Plaintiff”), by and through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant LR IA 6-1, submit the following stipulation to Extend Time to File Responsive Pleading up to and including January 14, 2022. In support of the stipulation, the parties state the following:
1. On December 15, 2021, Teletrack and Plaintiff submitted a Joint Motion to Amend the Complaint to substitute former Defendant CoreLogic for CoreLogic Teletrack. [ECF No. 11].
2. The Court granted the Parties' Motion, ECF No. 12, and the First Amended Complaint was filed on December 16, 2021. [ECF No. 12].
3. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15, Teletrack's deadline to respond to the Complaint is December 30, 2021.
4. The undersigned counsel is continuing to review and investigate the allegations in the Complaint.
5. Counsel for Plaintiff has agreed to the requested extension and the requested 1 extension will not impact any other deadlines in this case.
6. This is the first request to extend the deadline for Teletrack to file its responsive pleading.
7. This request for an extension of time is not intended to cause any undue delay or prejudice to any party.
8. Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate that the deadline for Teletrack to file its responsive pleading shall be extended through January 14, 2022.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED 2