Hall v. Daniels

Full title: EDWARD L. HALL, Petitioner, v. CHARLES DANIELS, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Oct 2, 2007

Civil No. 07-23-TC (D. Or. Oct. 2, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-23-TC.

October 2, 2007

ORDER

MICHAEL HOGAN, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on September 17, 2007. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. Petitioner's amended petition (#6) is denied and this proceeding is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.