From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jul 11, 2022
No. 10015-22S (U.S.T.C. Jul. 11, 2022)

Opinion

10015-22S

07-11-2022

JAMES MICHAEL HALL & PATRICIA S. HALL, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge

On June 22, 2022, the parties filed a proposed stipulated decision for the Court's consideration. Upon review of the record, however, it appears that petitioners may have paid the tax liability for the 2019 tax year prior to the issuance of the notice of deficiency. If so, the notice of deficiency issued to petitioners for the 2019 tax year is invalid and this Court lacks jurisdiction of this case. See Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527 (1985).

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that, on or before August 1, 2022, the parties shall show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid. We will hold the parties' proposed stipulated decision pending resolution of the jurisdictional issue in this case. 1


Summaries of

Hall v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jul 11, 2022
No. 10015-22S (U.S.T.C. Jul. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Hall v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MICHAEL HALL & PATRICIA S. HALL, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jul 11, 2022

Citations

No. 10015-22S (U.S.T.C. Jul. 11, 2022)