From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Commonwealth

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Feb 27, 2013
No. 218 MM 2012 (Pa. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

No. 218 MM 2012

02-27-2013

JAHMAD HALL, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2013, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and "Petition for Leave to Sue in Quo Warranto against Corporation Unlawfully Practicing Profession" are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record.


Summaries of

Hall v. Commonwealth

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Feb 27, 2013
No. 218 MM 2012 (Pa. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Hall v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:JAHMAD HALL, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

No. 218 MM 2012 (Pa. Feb. 27, 2013)