Opinion
No. 188 WAL 2016
2016-11-02
Earl D. HALL Sr.; Betty Jane Hall; and Earl D. Hall, Jr., on behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Petitioners v. CNX GAS COMPANY, LLC, in Its Own Right and as Successor-in-Interest to Consol Gas Company, LLC, Respondent
100 N.Y.S. 1128
99 Mass. 463
82 Ohio St. 456
120 Misc. 841
40 N.Y.S. 372
17 Misc. Rep. 296
236 A.D. 691
133 N.Y.S. 1127
281 Mont. 109
587 Pa. 510
901 A.2d 982
37 A.D. 203
109 N.Y.S. 1149
131 N.Y.S. 1013
147 A.D. 908
38 A.D. 284
182 Wash. App. 1054
64 Cal. App. 470
27 Cal. 2d 621
49 Pa. Commw. 198
59 N.J. 603
38 A.D. 344
639 Pa. 382
160 A.3d 787Earl D. HALL Sr.; Betty Jane Hall; and Earl D. Hall, Jr., on behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Petitioners v. CNX GAS COMPANY, LLC, in Its Own Right and as Successor-in-Interest to Consol Gas Company, LLC, RespondentNo. 188 WAL 2016Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaNovember 2, 2016
160 A.3d 787
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.