Opinion
2:22-cv-01642-CDS-DJA
10-20-2022
JUDD HALL, Plaintiff, v. CLARITY SERVICES, INC; 2233 PARADISE ROAD, LLC dba CASH FACTORY USA; FINWISE BANK; RISE CREDIT, Defendants.
Jennifer L. Braster Nevada Bar No. 9982 Benjamin B. Gordon Nevada Bar No. 15552 NAYLOR & BRASTER Cheryl O'Connor Nevada Bar No. 14745 JONES DAY Attorneys for Defendant Clarity Services, Inc. David H. Krieger Nevada Bar No. 9086 Shawn Wayne Miller Nevada Bar No. 7825 Attorneys for Plaintiff Judd Hall
Complaint Filed: 9/28/2022
Jennifer L. Braster Nevada Bar No. 9982
Benjamin B. Gordon Nevada Bar No. 15552
NAYLOR & BRASTER
Cheryl O'Connor Nevada Bar No. 14745
JONES DAY
Attorneys for Defendant Clarity Services, Inc.
David H. Krieger Nevada Bar No. 9086
Shawn Wayne Miller Nevada Bar No. 7825
Attorneys for Plaintiff Judd Hall
DEFENDANT CLARITY SERVICES, INC. AND PLAINTIFF'S FIRST STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
Defendant Clarity Services, Inc. (“Clarity”) and Plaintiff Judd Hall (“Plaintiff'), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this stipulation to extend the time for Clarity to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) pursuant to LR IA 6-1.
Plaintiff filed his Complaint on September 28, 2022, and currently, Clarity's responsive pleading is due October 21, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) The first extension will allow Clarity an opportunity to investigate the facts of this case and to avoid the incurrence of additional attorneys' fees when this matter may be resolved shortly. Plaintiff and Clarity stipulate and agree that Clarity shall have an extension until November 21, 2022, to file its responsive pleading.
This is Clarity's first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice any party, but to permit both Plaintiff and Clarity an opportunity to more fully investigate the claims alleged.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.