From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HALL v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 10, 2011
CASE NO. l:10-cv-01601-LJO-SMS PC (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. l:10-cv-01601-LJO-SMS PC.

May 10, 2011


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (ECF No. 17) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL


Plaintiff Tony Hall ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was filed on August 30, 2010. On April 7, 2011, the Court issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order. (ECF No. 16.) On May 6, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion for voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 17.)

"[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(I), `a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.'"Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) ( quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). "[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can't complain, and the district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it." Id. at 1078. No defendant has filed an answer or other responsive pleading.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a); and
2. All pending motions are terminated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

HALL v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 10, 2011
CASE NO. l:10-cv-01601-LJO-SMS PC (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2011)
Case details for

HALL v. CATE

Case Details

Full title:TONY HALL, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 10, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. l:10-cv-01601-LJO-SMS PC (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2011)