” Hall v. Kenton Cnty., Kentucky, No. CV21900054WOBCJS, 2022 WL 2442199, at *12 (E.D. Ky. July 5, 2022), aff'd sub nom. Hall v. Carl, No. 22-5702, 2023 WL 2553861 (6th Cir. Mar. 17, 2023) (quoting Shadrick v. Hopkins Cnty., 805 F.3d 724, 749 (6th Cir. 2015)). Thus, “[w]hether qualified immunity extends to an individual turns on whether their actions - or inactions - were discretionary or ministerial.
Because the facts indicate that Nurse Troendle could have perceived a substantial risk of serious harm to Thomas, a triable issue remains as to whether she actually did perceive or infer such a risk. See Clark-Murphy, 439 F.3d at 290 (citing Farmer, 511 U.S. at 842); see also Hall v. Kenton Cnty., Ky., No. 2:19-00054 (WOB-CJS), 2022 WL 2442199, at *8 (E.D. Ky. July 5, 2022), aff'd sub nom. Hall v. Carl, No. 22-5702, 2023 WL 2553861 (6th Cir. Mar. 17, 2023) (collecting cases) (“[A] jury is entitled to discredit the credibility of a defendant who claims that he or she did not perceive a substantial risk of serious harm to a prisoner.”).