From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. California Fruit Markets, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 29, 1944
268 App. Div. 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

December 29, 1944.

Present — Cunningham, P.J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.


Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the court committed reversible error in submitting to the jury the question whether or not the infant-plaintiff was sui juris at the time of the accident, proof being that the infant was sui juris at the time of the accident. All concur, except Cunningham, P.J., and McCurn, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action.)


Summaries of

Hall v. California Fruit Markets, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 29, 1944
268 App. Div. 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Hall v. California Fruit Markets, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL C. HALL, Respondent, v. CALIFORNIA FRUIT MARKETS, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1944

Citations

268 App. Div. 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)