From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Cal. Massage Therapy Council

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 30, 2024
24-cv-02108-RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-02108-RS

08-30-2024

KEVIN HALL, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA MASSAGE THERAPY COUNCIL, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

RICHARD SEEBORG CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The magistrate judge to whom this matter was initially assigned issued an order dismissing the complaint with leave to amend, and warning plaintiff that failure to file a timely first amended complaint would result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed. See Dkt. No. 6. When no amended complaint was filed, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation that the case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 7. The matter was then reassigned to the undersigned for disposition.

Plaintiff apparently has failed to keep the court apprised of his address, as the reassignment order and the Report and Recommendation were returned as undeliverable. In light of that, and given plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint, dismissal is warranted, and the Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted. The case is dismissed, and the Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hall v. Cal. Massage Therapy Council

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 30, 2024
24-cv-02108-RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Hall v. Cal. Massage Therapy Council

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN HALL, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA MASSAGE THERAPY COUNCIL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 30, 2024

Citations

24-cv-02108-RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2024)