From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Baugh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
May 28, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV216-HEH (E.D. Va. May. 28, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:20CV216-HEH

05-28-2020

JERRY R. HALL, Plaintiff, v. CLATLER BAUGH, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

By Memorandum Order entered on April 15, 2020, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. The Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff has not complied with the order of this Court. Plaintiff failed to return a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

HENRY E. HUDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: May 28, 2020
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Hall v. Baugh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
May 28, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV216-HEH (E.D. Va. May. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Hall v. Baugh

Case Details

Full title:JERRY R. HALL, Plaintiff, v. CLATLER BAUGH, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: May 28, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:20CV216-HEH (E.D. Va. May. 28, 2020)